linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@relog.ch>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: mlan@cpu.lu, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Control fb problem on 8500
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:21:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39A3899A.CA375CE8@relog.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.10.10008231008510.13478-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de


Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > > > I don't think having to use ShadowFB with the fbdev driver is too bad
> > > > because it should generally enhance performance :)
> > >
> > > I guess control is the exception. I found out it isn't worth the memory
> > > impact. I once ran a complete x11perf run comparing with and without
> > > shadowfb, and with shadowfb was overall slower. Some operations were
> > > faster, though, but not in general.
> >
> > Oh no. This is very bad.
>
> But that was on 4.0, not 4.0.1, right? shadowfb on 4.0 fbdev treated me to
> a ~5sec delay on logout while that nice grey pattern was drawn line by
> line. Someone said it was due to a bug in shadowfb... and I'd assume it
> was fixed in 4.0.1.

This is GNOME, right? There has been discussion about that on an XFree86 list
(if it was Xpert, you can search the archive if you like), it's a GNOME bug.
It used stippled rectangles to draw that, which led to the whole rectangle
area being considered updated and copied from the shadow framebuffer to the
real one.


Michel


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and the DRI project

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-08-23  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-08-15 17:45 Control fb problem on 8500 Kevin M. Myer
2000-08-15 18:26 ` Michel D nzer
2000-08-15 19:41 ` Michel Lanners
2000-08-18 21:02 ` Michel Lanners
2000-08-19  6:47   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-08-19  7:18     ` Michel Lanners
2000-08-19 11:59       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-19 14:15         ` XF4 hangs on 2.4 kernel (was: Re: Control fb problem on 8500) Michel Lanners
2000-08-19 15:16           ` Martin Costabel
2000-08-23 12:18           ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-08-19 12:12       ` Control fb problem on 8500 Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-21 11:25         ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-21 13:19           ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-21 16:44             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-21 17:11             ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-19 13:20       ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-21  8:57         ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-21 10:46           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-21 13:14             ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-21 16:45               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-22  8:33                 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-22  9:42                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-22 10:14                     ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-22 21:15                       ` Michel Lanners
2000-08-22 21:55                         ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-23 11:51                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-22 21:10                   ` Michel Lanners
2000-08-22 22:39                     ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-23  8:11                       ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-23  8:21                         ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2000-08-21 11:33           ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-19 14:40     ` David Riley
     [not found] <200008160459.XAA20764@lists.linuxppc.org>
2000-08-22 10:51 ` William H. Schultz
2000-08-22 11:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-22 16:52   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-23 14:03     ` William H. Schultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39A3899A.CA375CE8@relog.ch \
    --to=daenzer@relog.ch \
    --cc=daenzerm@student.ethz.ch \
    --cc=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=mlan@cpu.lu \
    --cc=schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).