linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Monro <davidm@amberdata.demon.co.uk>
To: Linux/ppc Dev List <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: strange PCI resource behaviour in 2.4
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 02:03:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39A47457.EB8AC497@amberdata.demon.co.uk> (raw)


Hi,

I'm seeing a strange problem with the PCI code on 2.4. What is happening
is that the PCI code seems to be detecting a memory region on my pcnet32
chip, but leaving it at 0x0:

prozac:~# lspci -v -vv -s 0c
00:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 [PCnet
LANCE] (rev 16)
	Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
	Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 15
	Region 0: I/O ports at 1000200 [disabled] [size=32]
	Region 1: Memory at <unassigned> (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled]
[size=32]
	Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=64K]

(On a 2.2 kernel, Region 1 and the Expansion ROM simply aren't there,
presumably bacuse the firmware doesn't enable them.)

This means when the device driver calls pci_enable_device, it doesn't
work.

excerpt from dmesg:
pcnet32_probe_pci: found device 0x001022.0x002000
  ioaddr=0x1000200  resource_flags=0x000101
PCI: Device 00:0c.0 not available because of resource collisions
pcnet32.c: failed to enable device -- err=-22

This is because the code in pcibios_enable_device() checks for the
combination of a region with a base of 0 and a non-0 end and fails if
that is the case.

I guess this is a consequence of the new code which searches for pci
regions rather then just accepting what the bios gives it. Should I make
it assign a sensible base address to the regions it finds, or fix it so
that the end address is also 0 if the start address is left at 0? Where
should the fix go? Note that I don't get any "PCI: Address space
collision on region ..." messages while booting, so the initialization
code doesn't seem to think there is a problem at any stage.

This is using an IBM 850.

Cheers,

	Davvid

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-08-24  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-08-24  1:03 David Monro [this message]
2000-08-24  2:33 ` strange PCI resource behaviour in 2.4 Frank Rowand
2000-08-24  4:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-08-24  5:59   ` David Monro
2000-08-24 19:43   ` David Monro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39A47457.EB8AC497@amberdata.demon.co.uk \
    --to=davidm@amberdata.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).