bitkeeper access ??

bitkeeper access ??

[Andreas Tobler]

Hi,

has anyone the same behaviour?

[andreas@wallstreet linuxppc_2_3]$ bk pull bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
pull: connect/access to bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 failed.

Both, the hq.fsmlabs.com and the bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com fail.

The pull on the linuxppc_2_2 branch works so far, although there is nothing to
pull.
Or is this only related to my config?

Thanks,

Andreas

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: bitkeeper access ??

[tom_gall]

Andreas Tobler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> has anyone the same behaviour?

Yup I saw this, this morning.

> [andreas@wallstreet linuxppc_2_3]$ bk pull bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
> pull: connect/access to bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 failed.
>
> Both, the hq.fsmlabs.com and the bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com fail.
>
> The pull on the linuxppc_2_2 branch works so far, although there is nothing to
> pull.
> Or is this only related to my config?

I didn't try a 2.2 pull just a 2.4 one ...

Regards,

Tom

--
Tom Gall - PowerPC Linux Team    "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center           supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com         shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558                 -- Marvin Martian
(h) tgall@uswest.net
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: bitkeeper access ??

[Martin Costabel]

Andreas Tobler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> has anyone the same behaviour?
>
> [andreas@wallstreet linuxppc_2_3]$ bk pull bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
> pull: connect/access to bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 failed.

Same thing here, since yesterday evening.

--
Martin

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: bitkeeper access ??

[Larry McVoy]

I've got to run out to a customer call; I'll look into this and make sure
it gets fixed as soon as I get back.  BitMover will be providing backup
mirrors for these trees soon.

--lm

On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 08:19:10PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> Andreas Tobler wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > has anyone the same behaviour?
> >
> > [andreas@wallstreet linuxppc_2_3]$ bk pull bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
> > pull: connect/access to bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 failed.
>
> Same thing here, since yesterday evening.
>
> --
> Martin
>

--
---
Larry McVoy            	   lm@bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: bitkeeper access ??

[Larry McVoy]

These trees are back up on fsmlabs.com.  Let me know if it still isn't working.

On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 11:28:03AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> I've got to run out to a customer call; I'll look into this and make sure
> it gets fixed as soon as I get back.  BitMover will be providing backup
> mirrors for these trees soon.
>
> --lm
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 08:19:10PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> >
> > Andreas Tobler wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > has anyone the same behaviour?
> > >
> > > [andreas@wallstreet linuxppc_2_3]$ bk pull bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
> > > pull: connect/access to bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000 failed.
> >
> > Same thing here, since yesterday evening.
> >
> > --
> > Martin
> >
>
> --
> ---
> Larry McVoy            	   lm@bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm
>

--
---
Larry McVoy            	   lm@bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: bitkeeper access ??

[Andreas Tobler]

Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> These trees are back up on fsmlabs.com.  Let me know if it still isn't working.

Works here again!

Thanks,

Andreas


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/