From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <39AE8559.A4F12B6D@relog.ch> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:18:33 +0200 From: Michel Dänzer Reply-To: daenzerm@student.ethz.ch MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Dietrich CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: asm statement in include/asm not ansi conform References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Marc Dietrich wrote: > after some testing dri works now. On startup X says "dri enabled" and > glinfo shows many supported GL functions. But at least when running > "gears" for example, I get no accelaration at all. Still 60 frames per > second - same as with software rendering. For me, gears gives even less FPS on startup with DRI than with software rendering ;) What happens when you maximize the window? A few possibilities to find out if you are really using direct rendering: - set LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose - run a program with lots of textured triangles (Quake, fire, ...) - test, compare, test, ... > I also have a P-III/500 box with Rage128 (AGP) witch produces 400 frames! DRI currently only runs in PIO mode as we don't have any GART driver yet. Anyway, this is a nice preview of what we could expect with AGP GART :) > Glxinfo says something like "RGB error" and breaks. Hmm, never tried it. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and the DRI project ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/