From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <39AF9699.5529818B@student.ethz.ch> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 13:44:25 +0200 From: Michel Dänzer MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timothy A. Seufert" CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: asm statement in include/asm not ansi conform References: <39AE8559.A4F12B6D@relog.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: "Timothy A. Seufert" wrote: > (II) r128(0): PLL parameters: rf=18432 rd=45949 min=-2143223788 > max=2088639352; xclk=0 > (==) r128(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) > (II) r128(0): Monitor0: Using hsync range of 30.00- 95.00 kHz > (II) r128(0): Monitor0: Using vrefresh range of 48.00-160.00 Hz > (II) r128(0): Clock range: -2143223.79 to -588442.96 MHz The PLL and clock values are bogus. You could try overriding the clock values in XF86Config. > For comparison, this is what I get with a mainline 4.0.1 tree with > Ani Joshi's replacement drivers for PPC (no DRI support of course): [snip] > I have checked out a copy of the PPC branch of the DRI CVS tree, so > if you need me to test with different things just let me know. Just putting Ani's r128 (or the whole xfree86) directory into the DRI tree should work, as the changes in the DRI branch are mostly outside the 2D driver. Please let me know if there are problems. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86 and The DRI Project ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/