From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <39BDD1E2.F0DC9B1D@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 02:49:06 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mlan@cpu.lu CC: greyham@research.canon.com.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Getting patches in (was: Re: Roles for distributions) References: <200009120614.IAA00922@piglet.grunz.lu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Michel Lanners wrote: > I agree that this seems to be a major problem of the PPC Linux port at > this time. It is not clear at all how the flow of patches from user > contribution, to PPC kernel tree, to Linus' tree is happening... and > unfortunately, too often, it just isn't happening. Cort posted the following on linux-kernel, this past Thursday. (Cort quoted with ">", Till Straumann quoted with "}") > } Can somebody please tell me, who is currently maintaining > } arch/ppc? > } > } The link > } > } http://www.ppc.kernel.org/ > } > } in the MAINTAINERS file is dead. > } > } Regards, Till > > It's unmaintained right now. The www.ppc.kernel.org site is gone. > Take a look at www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html for the PPC tree. > - ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/