From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
To: Arto Vuori <avuori@ssh.com>
Cc: Graham Stoney <greyham@research.canon.com.au>,
Brian Ford <ford@vss.fsi.com>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:33:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A37B2E4.B3944354@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A37B08A.3FE08AF7@ssh.com
Arto Vuori wrote:
> We also found and fixed some problems including:
I have been pushing driver updates into the BK linuxppc_2_5 tree,
but not into the linuxppc_2_3 tree as we are trying to stablize
that for 2.4. All of these you mentioned, and others have been
updated. The MII interface is still broken for some PHYs.
Once the linuxppc_2_5 driver is better, I will push it into the 2.4
baseline.
For all processors, the BK linuxppc_2_5 tree has many more updates
than the more visible 2_3 tree.
Send me any patches you have as you create them. It is lots easier
to add a few lines here and there than to get a bunch of changes
from an old baseline.
-- Dan
--
I like MMUs because I don't have a real life.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-13 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.21.0012071148420.515-100000@eos>
2000-12-07 18:11 ` 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling Brian Ford
2000-12-08 17:41 ` diekema_jon
2000-12-08 18:24 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-11 0:45 ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-11 15:27 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 2:36 ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-12 3:26 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-12 7:28 ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-12 16:32 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 16:58 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-12 17:17 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 21:03 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-13 1:15 ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-13 16:14 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-13 17:23 ` Arto Vuori
2000-12-13 17:33 ` Dan Malek [this message]
2000-12-13 17:55 ` Arto Vuori
2000-12-13 22:08 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-13 22:45 ` Jerry Van Baren
2000-12-13 22:53 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-14 17:29 ` FEC/FCC driver issues Brian Ford
2000-12-14 7:21 ` 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling Graham Stoney
2000-12-14 16:58 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-15 0:18 ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-12 15:26 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 17:12 ` Jerry Van Baren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A37B2E4.B3944354@mvista.com \
--to=dan@mvista.com \
--cc=avuori@ssh.com \
--cc=ford@vss.fsi.com \
--cc=greyham@research.canon.com.au \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).