From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3A37B818.CC0C5718@ssh.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:55:36 +0200 From: Arto Vuori MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Malek CC: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling References: <20001212182856.A8336@brixi.research.canon.com.au> <20001213121554.B17129@brixi.research.canon.com.au> <3A37A048.46E692A0@mvista.com> <3A37B08A.3FE08AF7@ssh.com> <3A37B2E4.B3944354@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Dan Malek wrote: > I have been pushing driver updates into the BK linuxppc_2_5 tree, > but not into the linuxppc_2_3 tree as we are trying to stablize > that for 2.4. All of these you mentioned, and others have been > updated. The MII interface is still broken for some PHYs. OK > For all processors, the BK linuxppc_2_5 tree has many more updates > than the more visible 2_3 tree. Is there any way to get BK linuxppc_2_5 tree without using BitKeeper tools?? I found only older snapshots on FTP site. Also rsync is unable to find linuxppc_2_5 snapshot. -Arto -- Arto Vuori email: avuori@ssh.com mobile: +358 40 754 5223 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/