linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
To: Graham Stoney <greyham@research.canon.com.au>
Cc: Brian Ford <ford@vss.fsi.com>, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:58:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A38FC27.CE7F7F24@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20001214182126.E8430@brixi.research.canon.com.au


Graham Stoney wrote:

> > The advantage of Graham's DMA into skbufs isn't that the driver doesn't
> > copy/sum, it is that later when the IP stack does it we get burst transfers
> > into cache.
>
> But we get burst transfers into cache in either case,

No, because I originally allocated the receive buffers uncached.
Only cached/copyback pages will burst on the bus.  The CPM DMA will
always burst.


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-12-14 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.GSO.4.21.0012071148420.515-100000@eos>
2000-12-07 18:11 ` 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling Brian Ford
2000-12-08 17:41   ` diekema_jon
2000-12-08 18:24     ` Brian Ford
2000-12-11  0:45   ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-11 15:27     ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12  2:36       ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-12  3:26         ` Dan Malek
2000-12-12  7:28           ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-12 16:32             ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 16:58               ` Dan Malek
2000-12-12 17:17                 ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 21:03                   ` Dan Malek
2000-12-13  1:15               ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-13 16:14                 ` Dan Malek
2000-12-13 17:23                   ` Arto Vuori
2000-12-13 17:33                     ` Dan Malek
2000-12-13 17:55                       ` Arto Vuori
2000-12-13 22:08                   ` Brian Ford
2000-12-13 22:45                     ` Jerry Van Baren
2000-12-13 22:53                     ` Dan Malek
2000-12-14 17:29                       ` FEC/FCC driver issues Brian Ford
2000-12-14  7:21                   ` 2.5 or 2.4 kernel profiling Graham Stoney
2000-12-14 16:58                     ` Dan Malek [this message]
2000-12-15  0:18                       ` Graham Stoney
2000-12-12 15:26         ` Brian Ford
2000-12-12 17:12           ` Jerry Van Baren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A38FC27.CE7F7F24@mvista.com \
    --to=dan@mvista.com \
    --cc=ford@vss.fsi.com \
    --cc=greyham@research.canon.com.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).