From: Sébastien Côté <scote1@matrox.com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@mvista.com>
Cc: LinuxPPC-embedded list <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: initrd problems
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:22:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6877E3.AA2238C2@matrox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20010118130139.A5256@cx258813-a.chnd1.az.home.com
Matt Porter wrote:
> > I was also wondering if I loaded the kernel correctly. I put my
> > zImage+initrd (zvmlinux.initrd) at address 0 of ram. Since I compiled
> > the kernel with debug symbols, it takes a few Megs... Could it be too
> > large for it's own good? Maybe somebody knows about the answer to that
> > one!
>
> What does the bootloader show when it relocates the zImage and initrd?
> How about a progress dump so we have something to help you with? You
> make some comments about not using a special bootloader then say
> you are loading a zImage (from the Sandpoint port) which does have
> a relocating bootloader. This smells like a custom board port where
> you've gutted or dropped a bootloader and don't have the r3-r6 set
> up correctly for entry into arch/ppc/kernel/head.S. Are you really
> just dropping vmlinux at address 0? Details details...
I'll try to see what happens when the image is moved now that I know
this might be the problem, but my stupid debugger isn't friendly at all
and it's very difficult to do so.
I tought the image wouldn't be moved if I placed it a address 0. I copy
my zvmlinux.initrd at this address so I tought it wouldn't be used.
This is indeed a custom board and I'm really just dropping vmlinux at
address 0.
I also found out that the values of initrd_start and initrd_end aren't
valid when assigned from r4 and r5, so something must be overwriting
these values (intrd_end is smaller than initrd_start)
What's the use for r3? I read it's board identification but I don't
really care if my board isn't identified correctly (for now at least).
A looked for documentation about this but couldn't find any (the booting
process of linux on a PowerPc seems to be terribly undocumented)
Thanks for your help,
Sébastien Côté
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-19 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-18 15:53 initrd problems Sébastien Côté
2001-01-18 22:27 ` Sébastien Côté
2001-01-18 20:01 ` Matt Porter
2001-01-19 17:22 ` Sébastien Côté [this message]
2001-01-20 14:35 ` Matt Porter
2001-01-22 18:56 ` Sébastien Côté
2001-01-22 19:24 ` Kyle Harris
2001-01-22 20:45 ` Sébastien Côté
2001-01-19 1:13 ` Mark A. Greer
2001-01-19 14:53 ` Sébastien Côté
2001-01-23 21:03 ` Michael Pruznick
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-30 16:28 Anders Blomdell
2002-10-30 16:47 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-04-24 5:32 Sriram Narasimhan
2003-04-24 7:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A6877E3.AA2238C2@matrox.com \
--to=scote1@matrox.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=mporter@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).