From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3A68CE7A.F11219A7@inn.ericsson.se>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:32:10 +0100
From: Kenneth Johansson <kenneth.johansson@inn.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
CC: iweiny@pacbell.net, linuxdev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Linux/PPC BitKeeper tree announcements
References: <20010109161126.P18696@hq.fsmlabs.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010119123352.03511010@mail.munich.netsurf.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Franz Sirl wrote:
>
> At 02:50 2001-01-19, iweiny@pacbell.net wrote:
>
> >At the risk of sounding stupid I guess I need a newer compiler than egcs for
> >the new kernel trees?
> >
> >fork.c:353: fixed or forbidden register 68 (0) was spilled for class CR0_REGS.
> >This may be due to a compiler bug or to impossible asm
> >statements or clauses.
>
> You shouldn't be using _anything_ older than gcc-2.95.2 on PPC anymore. In
> the meantime the release of gcc-2.95.3 is pending and I would _strongly_
> recommend you to use it.

Why do you so strongly recommend using it?

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/