linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
To: paulus@linuxcare.com.au
Cc: Michel Ddnzer <michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Jeff Hartmann <jhartmann@valinux.com>,
	Gareth Hughes <gareth@valinux.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] PPC Lockup (ati-pcigart-branch)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:13:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6CCCBB.270DF241@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 14956.50865.856754.439761@diego.linuxcare.com.au


Paul Mackerras wrote:

> Which means that *pgd == 0, which is very odd indeed, unless of course
> you have run off the end of the vmalloc'd area (I assume you haven't).

Right, I made the same assumption, this was the first time through
the loop.

> What is the value of the symbol swapper_pg_dir in this kernel?

It looks like swapper_pg_dir because of it's low memory address.


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-23  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-19  3:26 PPC Lockup (ati-pcigart-branch) Michel Dänzer
2001-01-19  3:55 ` Dan Malek
2001-01-19  6:53   ` [Dri-devel] " Gareth Hughes
2001-01-19 16:48     ` Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-19 17:24     ` Dan Malek
2001-01-20  0:45       ` Gareth Hughes
2001-01-19 16:40 ` [Dri-devel] " Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-19 17:11   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-01-19 22:26     ` Chris Emerson
2001-01-19 22:59       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-01-19 23:43         ` Chris Emerson
2001-01-20  1:38           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-01-20 13:21             ` Michael Schmitz
2001-01-20 16:00               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-01-20 17:03                 ` Michael Schmitz
2001-01-20  2:46     ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-20  4:17       ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-22  9:44         ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-22 17:59           ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-22 18:18             ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-22 18:54               ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-22 19:39                 ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 20:08                   ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-22 20:30                   ` Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-22 21:23                     ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-22 23:12                       ` Frank Rowand
2001-01-22 21:31                     ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 21:48                       ` Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-22 22:15                         ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-23 16:14                         ` Mike Beede
2001-01-22 22:31                       ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-23  0:24                         ` Dan Malek
2001-01-23  2:28                           ` Takashi Oe
2001-01-23  2:40                             ` Dan Malek
2001-01-23  4:40                               ` Ralph Metzler
2001-01-23  5:48                               ` Takashi Oe
2001-01-23 11:24                           ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-23  0:34                         ` Frank Rowand
2001-01-23  0:43                           ` Frank Rowand
2001-01-23 11:32                           ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-22 20:43                   ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-22 21:07                     ` Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-22 17:33         ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 17:38           ` Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-22 17:38           ` Gareth Hughes
2001-01-22 17:43           ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-22 18:36             ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 18:44               ` Jeff Hartmann
2001-01-22 18:47               ` Michel Dänzer
2001-01-22 21:13         ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 21:58           ` Roman Zippel
2001-01-22 23:48         ` Paul Mackerras
2001-01-23  0:13           ` Dan Malek [this message]
2001-01-20 13:15       ` Michael Schmitz
2001-01-19 17:11   ` Wolfgang Denk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-23  3:34 Iain Sandoe
2001-01-23  6:49 Robert E Brose II
2001-01-23  7:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A6CCCBB.270DF241@mvista.com \
    --to=dan@mvista.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gareth@valinux.com \
    --cc=jhartmann@valinux.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch \
    --cc=paulus@linuxcare.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).