From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3ACC3424.609A880F@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 02:00:20 -0700 From: Matthew Locke MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: "'Santiago Garcia Mantinan'" , acpi@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [Acpi] acpi=no-idle should be automatic References: <4148FEAAD879D311AC5700A0C969E8905DE7E2@orsmsx35.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: "Grover, Andrew" wrote: > Device power management specifically does not require ACPI. That's why I > requested that a second listserv (linux-power) be set up for non-ACPI PM > discussions. I'm hoping that PM development will be accelerating, and will > use that list, just to keep the distinction clear. What about creating a project on sourceforge.net for power management? It might help to have a site dedicated to power management in general. That way we have a central resource for all info, code, etc across architectures. I know the ppc guys have done a lot of work already with power management. We could call it linux-pm, it helps you get your zzzzZZZZZs:) Matthew Locke Montavista Software, Inc http://www.mvista.com ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/