From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3AD4A4D6.811075AD@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:39:18 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Malek Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien=20C=F4t=E9?= , LinuxPPC-embedded list Subject: Re: frequency in sandpoint_calibrate_decr References: <3AD4722B.3B22120@matrox.com> <3AD48FE2.3FBE7B65@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Yep, I highly recommend upgrading to the latest fsmlabs version. Mark -- Dan Malek wrote: > Sébastien Côté wrote: > > > In MontaVista's kernel 2.4.0-test2, the frequency in > > sandpoint_calibrate_decr() is set to 66 Mhz. What frequency is this? > > The processor, the bus ??? > > That's the speed of the processor bus, usually from which all > other core clocks are derived. You should be using a newer version > of the kernel, at least from FSM Labs BitKeeper. In the source > code pipeline is a change of the clock value from MHz to Hz. > > > Increasing this speed seems to get rid of my stability problems (at > > last!), so I'd like to know the real value I should put there. > > Eh? On most systems it won't do anything but affect the ability > of the kernel to keep time correctly. > > -- Dan > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/