From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3AF8747F.13195FB0@acm.org> Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 15:34:40 -0700 From: Ira Weiny MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Malek , linxuppc-emb Subject: Re: dcache BUG() References: <3AF72CA8.52163E55@mvista.com> <03a001c0d74e$60022c70$4b00000a@foolio1> <3AF73161.26986237@mvista.com> <040a01c0d754$1bf6d5c0$4b00000a@foolio1> <3AF740C0.F65FBCB8@mvista.com> <047301c0d75c$2da00a00$4b00000a@foolio1> <3AF747C4.9C2D74A5@mvista.com> <3AF8348F.FEBF22DE@routefree.com> <3AF856AE.80D0C230@mvista.com> <3AF86649.A5351CD5@routefree.com> <3AF869E7.C5176D36@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Dan Malek wrote: > Oh, yes, it will get to a shell prompt. I just don't know what > else you may need to run some of these tests, or what you may > discover later :-). There have been lots of PCI updates that are > in the pipeline for the upcoming 2.4/2.4_devel that aren't part of > the linuxppc_2_5 tree. It basically makes the PCI look like all > other PowerPC PCI systems. When is this comming out? I heard 2.0 has been pushed back to June? Ira Weiny ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/