From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
Cc: frowand@mvista.com, Brian Kuschak <brian.kuschak@skystream.com>,
Eli Chen <eli@routefree.com>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: dcache BUG()
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 14:49:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AFC342C.8C224CD8@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.HPX.4.10.10105111119110.29518-100000@gra-ux1.iram.es
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> Nother do 601, 603, and a lot of others...
Oh, I believe they do..........but, I haven't been wrong lately,
so maybe it's my turn again :-).
> For a proof I just tested the sequence lwarx + stw + sync ....
OK, so I learned my one thing for the day, I'm going home now...
> Not even "in some other contexts".
That was a bad choice of words on my part. I should have used
"function scope" or something like that. I was responding to about
three different messages at the time, sorry.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-11 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-09 16:40 dcache BUG() Brian Kuschak
2001-05-09 18:31 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-09 19:18 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 18:39 ` Frank Rowand
2001-05-10 18:49 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 19:10 ` Frank Rowand
2001-05-11 4:23 ` Paul Mielke
2001-05-11 10:09 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 20:56 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-10 23:14 ` Cort Dougan
2001-05-11 11:01 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-11 10:57 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-11 18:49 ` Dan Malek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-12 0:44 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-12 0:57 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-14 9:28 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-10 21:20 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-10 21:26 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 17:43 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-09 11:06 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-08 15:43 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-08 3:36 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-08 1:53 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-08 2:03 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 11:59 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-08 0:40 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 23:01 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 22:19 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 22:35 ` Cort Dougan
2001-05-07 22:43 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-07 19:04 Eli Chen
2001-05-07 21:04 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 21:17 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 21:30 ` Tom Rini
2001-05-07 23:03 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 21:47 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-07 23:01 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 23:06 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-07 23:15 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 23:28 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-07 23:35 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-07 23:36 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 0:16 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-08 0:41 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 1:14 ` Eli Chen
2001-05-08 1:11 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 18:01 ` David Blythe
2001-05-08 20:27 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 21:34 ` David Blythe
2001-05-08 21:49 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 22:34 ` Ira Weiny
2001-05-08 22:53 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-08 1:37 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-08 1:44 ` Dan Malek
2001-05-07 23:40 ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-05-07 17:21 Brian Kuschak
2001-05-07 20:58 ` Dan Malek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AFC342C.8C224CD8@mvista.com \
--to=dan@mvista.com \
--cc=brian.kuschak@skystream.com \
--cc=eli@routefree.com \
--cc=frowand@mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=paubert@iram.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).