From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3AFC342C.8C224CD8@mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 14:49:16 -0400
From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
Cc: frowand@mvista.com, Brian Kuschak <brian.kuschak@skystream.com>,
	Eli Chen <eli@routefree.com>, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: dcache BUG()
References: <Pine.HPX.4.10.10105111119110.29518-100000@gra-ux1.iram.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>

> Nother do 601, 603, and a lot of others...

Oh, I believe they do..........but, I haven't been wrong lately,
so maybe it's my turn again :-).

> For a proof I just tested the sequence lwarx + stw + sync ....

OK, so I learned my one thing for the day, I'm going home now...

> Not even "in some other contexts".

That was a bad choice of words on my part.  I should have used
"function scope" or something like that.  I was responding to about
three different messages at the time, sorry.


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/