From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3B39524B.5090108@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:26:03 -0700 From: Matthew Locke MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Habermann Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Segmentation fault while dynamic linking References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010626172652.00a69210@pop.gmx.de> <5.0.2.1.0.20010627091411.00a56b90@pop.gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Michael Habermann wrote: > At 10:12 AM 6/26/2001 -0700, Matthew Locke wrote: > >>> My configuration: Kernel 2.4.4, glibc 2.2.2, bash 2.05, FADS, MPC855T >> >> >> who's toolchain are you using? glibc 2.2.x has a cacheline size bug >> for the smaller cacheline ppc processors. Our toolchain has a fix for >> it. grab our HHL 2.0 Journeyman edition and give it a try. >> http://www.mvista.com > > > binutils 2.11.2 > gcc 2.95.3 > glibc 2.2.2 > > Everything unpatched and downloaded from ftp.gnu.org. yeah, sounds like the cacheline problem. It is still in glibc 2.2.2 and 2.2.3. > > I've read in the mailing list, that the glibc needs to be patched. But > I've found that the most changes are already made at glibc2.2.2, so I > assumed it should work. > > The kernel is 2.4.4 from ftp.denx.de, patched by a patch posted from > Dave Ellis. > > Ok, I try the mvista glibc. > > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/