linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* SSSSlllloooowwww MPC8240
@ 2001-07-09 23:57 Andrew Johnson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Johnson @ 2001-07-09 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LinuxPPC-Embedded


Can anybody suggest why I'm seeing the following:

Under Hard Hat Linux 2.0 (2.4.2 kernel) on my MVME2100 board (MPC8240 CPU
running at 200MHz), Linux startup reports a BogoMIPS rating of 9.59.  I've
just built and run the exact same calibration code under vxWorks, and here
I get a rating of 133.73 BogoMIPS, which seems much more likely to be
correct.  Linux does seem rather sluggish at running things, so I don't
think it's problem with the calibration.  Any ideas what could be going on
behind the scenes to slow Linux down, and how I might track it down?

I wonder whether it's related to that openpic interrupt stuff in the other
thread...

TIA,

- Andrew
--
The world is such a cheerful place when viewed from upside-down
It makes a rise of every fall, a smile of every frown

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: SSSSlllloooowwww MPC8240
       [not found] <002AB7E4.C21188@aps.anl.gov>
@ 2001-07-10  1:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
  2001-07-10 20:47   ` Andrew Johnson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2001-07-10  1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-embedded


Is caching enabled (both instruction and data)?  It sounds a lot like
you are running without the benefit of caches.  Another possibility is
that you are being swamped with interrupts, but I vaguely recall that
should not be a problem for the start up bogomips calculation.

gvb


At 06:57 PM 7/9/01 -0400, anj@aps.anl.gov wrote:

>Can anybody suggest why I'm seeing the following:
>
>Under Hard Hat Linux 2.0 (2.4.2 kernel) on my MVME2100 board (MPC8240 CPU
>running at 200MHz), Linux startup reports a BogoMIPS rating of 9.59.  I've
>just built and run the exact same calibration code under vxWorks, and here
>I get a rating of 133.73 BogoMIPS, which seems much more likely to be
>correct.  Linux does seem rather sluggish at running things, so I don't
>think it's problem with the calibration.  Any ideas what could be going on
>behind the scenes to slow Linux down, and how I might track it down?
>
>I wonder whether it's related to that openpic interrupt stuff in the other
>thread...
>
>TIA,
>
>- Andrew
>--
>The world is such a cheerful place when viewed from upside-down
>It makes a rise of every fall, a smile of every frown
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: SSSSlllloooowwww MPC8240
  2001-07-10  1:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2001-07-10 20:47   ` Andrew Johnson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Johnson @ 2001-07-10 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jerry Van Baren; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded


Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>
> Is caching enabled (both instruction and data)?  It sounds a lot like
> you are running without the benefit of caches.

That was it - thanks Jerry, I now get 133.12 BogoMIPS and a much more
responsive machine.

- Andrew
--
The world is such a cheerful place when viewed from upside-down
It makes a rise of every fall, a smile of every frown

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-10 20:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-09 23:57 SSSSlllloooowwww MPC8240 Andrew Johnson
     [not found] <002AB7E4.C21188@aps.anl.gov>
2001-07-10  1:37 ` Jerry Van Baren
2001-07-10 20:47   ` Andrew Johnson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).