From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
To: Cindy Peters <cinpet@adaptivemicro.com>
Cc: "'linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org'"
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: New Linux PowerPC development
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:26:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B5DAFC9.414B4788@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: A109131318C4D1119AC20060088DECE35732DF@mail.adaptivemicro.com
Cindy Peters wrote:
> The MPC823, however, does not have an IDE or PCI interface for a hard disk.
Sure it does. Just use the PCMCIA.
> We feel we would have to design an interface into an FPGA.
This is also a solution many people use. Lots less expensive and
less complex than a PCI adapter.
> .... It doesn't
> support 100BaseT either.
So, the 832 loses here :-).
> ..... We are also looking at using either the
> MPC8260/MPC8265 or the IBM 405GP.
Wow. The 823, 405, 8260 span a huge range in performance and features
(and price). You need to consider some other requirements to make this
decision. If the 823 would be enough performance, you can step up to
the 860(D/T/P) and get more performance. Depending upon the application,
the 860P can be higher performance than the 405 because it will offload
the integrated peripherals to the CPM. The highest performance of the
bunch is the 82xx, which also includes hardware floating point, if that
is important.
> .... I would like some feedback from people that have experience in using
> these processors with Linux and what recommendations they have.
I've used them all, and they all have advantages and disadvantages.
You didn't list many requirements that would clearly show one is better
suited for your application. Based on what you said, and past experience
with the 823, I would choose something from the 855/860 family.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-24 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-24 14:56 New Linux PowerPC development Cindy Peters
2001-07-24 15:26 ` AW: " Stefan Roese
2001-07-24 15:35 ` David Updegraff
2001-07-24 15:44 ` Grant Erickson
2001-07-24 17:26 ` Dan Malek [this message]
2001-07-25 17:14 ` Ralph Blach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-31 21:39 Cindy Peters
2001-07-31 21:52 ` Grant Erickson
2001-07-31 23:32 ` Matthew Locke
2001-07-31 23:41 ` Cort Dougan
2001-07-31 23:56 ` Mark Hatle
2001-08-01 3:09 ` Cort Dougan
2001-07-31 23:56 ` Tom Rini
2001-07-31 23:54 ` Mark Hatle
2001-07-31 23:55 ` Matthew Locke
2001-08-01 4:22 James F Dougherty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B5DAFC9.414B4788@mvista.com \
--to=dan@mvista.com \
--cc=cinpet@adaptivemicro.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).