From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3B829C48.64C5FCDF@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:37:12 -0700 From: Scott Anderson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felix Radensky Cc: Linix PPC Emmbedded Subject: Re: BDI2000 vs RiskWatch References: <3B8212A6.9AF31020@allot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Felix Radensky wrote: > Can someone please explain what BDI2000 can do that RiskWatch cannot. To me, the main thing is that it integrates well with a Linux development box. I use my normal debug tools (ddd/gdb) and the BDI2000 acts like a gdbserver for the kernel. For things such as FLASHing code into the target, you just telnet into the BDI2000. Bottom line: If you are developing on Windows, the RiscWatch is probably what you want. If you are developing on Linux (which I hope is the case), you want a BDI2000. Otherwise, you're going to need a Windows box for RiscWatch to run on and then you'll have to set up Samba or some other mechanism for the Windows box/RiscWatch to see your sources, etc. Scott Anderson scott_anderson@mvista.com MontaVista Software Inc. (408)328-9214 1237 East Arques Ave. http://www.mvista.com Sunnyvale, CA 94085 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/