From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3B956C82.D2D7E9C6@mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 20:06:26 -0400
From: Dan Malek <dan@mvista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: andrew may <acmay@acmay.homeip.net>
Cc: John Tyner <jtyner@cs.ucr.edu>,
	linuxppc-commit@source.mvista.com,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: ppc405 enet changes (fwd)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109031513110.21186-200000@hill.cs.ucr.edu> <3B9557CA.D76C70E2@mvista.com> <20010904152608.B14548@ecam.san.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


andrew may wrote:

> Well we don't have the hardware to do multiple devices. I just know
> that is possible in the future. I would prefer to go through the
> pain of removing the static's now rather than later.

Ummm...OK, I guess.


> No I don't expect the patch to go in quickly. I just wanted John
> to start the process off.

OK.  Once I actually get the 2_4_devel kernel booting and running with
some sense of reliability, I'll add the patch and give it a go.

> So if you want to point to specific code that you don't like let
> us know.

Yeah, all of the linux version stuff.  It is nice to get patches against
the current 2_4 or 2_4_devel that are known to be tested and working.
If you can't test it, don't expect a quick turn around because someone
else (like me :-) has to spend the time doing it.

Thanks.


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/