From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3BA10D1F.3F27E3C7@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:46:39 -0500 From: Mark Hatle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Locke Cc: "Donovan, Chris" , Linuxppc-Embedded Subject: Re: Status on 403 (Oak) support References: <3BA0FA9E.5010204@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: > Donovan, Chris wrote: > I (with the help of Matt Locke) are working with on 403GCX support. It's in pretty bad shape right now. If you are interested in helping, I have some initial patches that fix simple 403 vs 405 differences. --Mark > > I'm trying to run linux on a board with a 403GCX processor on it. I ran into > > an error while trying to compile the kernel as follows: > > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:83: Error: unsupported relocation type > > {standard input}:84: Error: unsupported relocation type > > {standard input}:111: Error: unsupported relocation type > > {standard input}:128: Error: unsupported relocation type > > {standard input}:145: Error: unsupported relocation type > > {standard input}:149: Error: unsupported relocation type > > {standard input}:64: Error: unsupported relocation type > > make[1]: *** [ppc4xx_pic.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/d/ctemp/src/src-linuxppc_2_4/arch/ppc/kernel' > > make: *** [_dir_arch/ppc/kernel] Error 2 > > > > While searching the archives I found a thread which mentioned that that > > kernel no longer compiles for the 403 processor and there was no mention of > > a solution to the problem. Which version of the kernel should work on the > > 403GCX? Thanks for your help. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/