* BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
@ 2001-09-19 9:36 Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 10:38 ` Matt Porter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Scholz @ 2001-09-19 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hi there,
I am trying to get the latest kernel sources.
But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"
results today (!?) in
drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
Has anyone else the same problem?
BTW which one has the most recent source: ppc.bkserver.net oder
source.mvista.com???
Cheers,
Steven
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 9:36 BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel Steven Scholz
@ 2001-09-19 10:38 ` Matt Porter
2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-20 0:12 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matt Porter @ 2001-09-19 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Scholz; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded, trini
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"
>
> results today (!?) in
>
> drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
>
> Has anyone else the same problem?
Yes. Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
> BTW which one has the most recent source: ppc.bkserver.net oder
> source.mvista.com???
source.mvista.com is a mirror of ppc.bkserver.net. I'm using
ppc.bkserver.net for now.
--
Matt Porter
MontaVista Software, Inc.
mporter@mvista.com
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 10:38 ` Matt Porter
@ 2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 14:58 ` Steven Scholz
` (2 more replies)
2001-09-20 0:12 ` Tom Rini
1 sibling, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2001-09-19 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Porter; +Cc: Steven Scholz, linuxppc-embedded
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> > But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"
> >
> > results today (!?) in
> >
> > drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
> >
> > Has anyone else the same problem?
>
> Yes. Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
Er, there's a problem? I didn't know you could do a clone from the
http one, just the bk:// version. I'll try updating the bk version
running on source later this afternoon.
bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
Did the http version ever work?
--
Tom
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
@ 2001-09-19 14:58 ` Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 15:13 ` Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 15:41 ` Matt Porter
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Scholz @ 2001-09-19 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: linuxppc-embedded
Tom Rini wrote:
> Er, there's a problem? I didn't know you could do a clone from the
> http one, just the bk:// version. I'll try updating the bk version
> running on source later this afternoon.
>
> bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
> Did the http version ever work?
Since I am sitting behind a proxy/firewall HTTP seems to be the only way
to get the sources.
I could clone the tree from http://ppc.bkserver.net. bk pull and bk
resync worked as well.
But bk:// and http:// should get me the same results, don't they?
Steven
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 14:58 ` Steven Scholz
@ 2001-09-19 15:13 ` Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 16:43 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-09-19 15:41 ` Matt Porter
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Scholz @ 2001-09-19 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: Matt Porter, linuxppc-embedded
> Er, there's a problem? I didn't know you could do a clone from the
> http one, just the bk:// version. I'll try updating the bk version
> running on source later this afternoon.
>
> bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
> Did the http version ever work?
Is it posible at all to use bk:// through a proxie server?
If so, please tell me how. Which Port?
The BitKeeper docs aren't exactly very detailed.
Cheers,
Steven
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 14:58 ` Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 15:13 ` Steven Scholz
@ 2001-09-19 15:41 ` Matt Porter
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matt Porter @ 2001-09-19 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: Matt Porter, Steven Scholz, linuxppc-embedded
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:46:10AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> > > But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"
> > >
> > > results today (!?) in
> > >
> > > drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
> > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
> > >
> > > Has anyone else the same problem?
> >
> > Yes. Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
>
> Er, there's a problem? I didn't know you could do a clone from the
> http one, just the bk:// version. I'll try updating the bk version
> running on source later this afternoon.
>
> bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
[hands waving]
Didn't work yesterday using the bk URI...perhaps it's intermittent. :)
--
Matt Porter
MontaVista Software, Inc.
mporter@mvista.com
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 15:13 ` Steven Scholz
@ 2001-09-19 16:43 ` Kenneth Johansson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Johansson @ 2001-09-19 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Scholz; +Cc: Tom Rini, Matt Porter, linuxppc-embedded
Steven Scholz wrote:
>
> > Er, there's a problem? I didn't know you could do a clone from the
> > http one, just the bk:// version. I'll try updating the bk version
> > running on source later this afternoon.
> >
> > bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
> > Did the http version ever work?
>
> Is it posible at all to use bk:// through a proxie server?
> If so, please tell me how. Which Port?
> The BitKeeper docs aren't exactly very detailed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steven
Well I never got it to work and since I never read anything from anyone that
it works assumed it just was not implemented.
But now I did some more testing and it turns out that bk when using http://
thru a firewall really do need the port number part of the http_proxy env
variable or else it won't work.
--
Kenneth Johansson
Ericsson Business Innovation AB Tel: +46 8 404 71 83
Viderögatan 3 Fax: +46 8 404 72 72
164 80 Stockholm kenneth.johansson@inn.ericsson.se
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel
2001-09-19 10:38 ` Matt Porter
2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
@ 2001-09-20 0:12 ` Tom Rini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2001-09-20 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Porter; +Cc: Steven Scholz, linuxppc-embedded
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> > But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"
> >
> > results today (!?) in
> >
> > drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
> >
> > Has anyone else the same problem?
>
> Yes. Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
Okay. This specific problem has a simple cause. source.mvista.com runs
an actual webserver. So, if you're behind a strict proxy:
bk pull http://ppc.bkserver.net/tree_name
If there's enough interest and people affected willing to test, I'll
see if we can setup some automagic redirect, but I suspect this will
fail since data would still be on port 14360.
> > BTW which one has the most recent source: ppc.bkserver.net oder
> > source.mvista.com???
>
> source.mvista.com is a mirror of ppc.bkserver.net. I'm using
> ppc.bkserver.net for now.
Okay. Regarding the flakiness Matt noticed, I upgraded bk again, and
if you don't get something similar to this:
$ bk version
BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.0pre3.1 20010918150405 for x86-glibc22-linux
Built by: lm@glibc22.bitmover.com
Built on: Tue Sep 18 10:48:28 PDT 2001
Go ahead and upgrade and try again.
--
Tom
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-20 0:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-19 9:36 BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 10:38 ` Matt Porter
2001-09-19 14:46 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-19 14:58 ` Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 15:13 ` Steven Scholz
2001-09-19 16:43 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-09-19 15:41 ` Matt Porter
2001-09-20 0:12 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).