From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:43:38 +0200 From: Kenneth Johansson Subject: Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel To: Steven Scholz Cc: Tom Rini , Matt Porter , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Message-id: <3BA8CB3A.4A8CB4B0@inn.ericsson.se> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 References: <3BA86732.363312A4@imc-berlin.de> <20010919033824.B5042@cx258813-a.chnd1.az.home.com> <20010919074610.B17996@entropy.crashing.org> <3BA8B60C.E3FBFC24@imc-berlin.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Steven Scholz wrote: > > > Er, there's a problem? I didn't know you could do a clone from the > > http one, just the bk:// version. I'll try updating the bk version > > running on source later this afternoon. > > > > bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho. > > Did the http version ever work? > > Is it posible at all to use bk:// through a proxie server? > If so, please tell me how. Which Port? > The BitKeeper docs aren't exactly very detailed. > > Cheers, > > Steven Well I never got it to work and since I never read anything from anyone that it works assumed it just was not implemented. But now I did some more testing and it turns out that bk when using http:// thru a firewall really do need the port number part of the http_proxy env variable or else it won't work. -- Kenneth Johansson Ericsson Business Innovation AB Tel: +46 8 404 71 83 Viderögatan 3 Fax: +46 8 404 72 72 164 80 Stockholm kenneth.johansson@inn.ericsson.se ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/