From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3BBE6B92.60497E1@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 22:25:22 -0400 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ricardo Scop Cc: Andrew Johnson , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: BK to CVS? References: <20011003130559.F31866@borg.org> <20011005111145.C8157@borg.org> <3BBDD64F.97B0057B@aps.anl.gov> <01100519044401.01029@scop.digitel.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Ricardo Scop wrote: > We internally use CVS nowadays, therefore I'm very interested in your > standard procedures to manage externally developed code. I would appreciate a patch against the current linuxppc_2_4_devel tree. Please pull the latest tree, do your work in that tree, and then generate a patch using one of the convenient bk commands that I hope Tom Rini can suggest :-). It's quite time consuming to get patches that are "almost" up to date and having to manually sort out the differences. I could spend 24 hours a day just applying and testing patches sent to my personal e-mail addresses. It _really_ helps when they are up to date :-). Thanks. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/