* [PATCH] Various patches against linuxppc_dev-2.4.13-pre6
@ 2001-10-23 6:25 David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
2001-10-23 14:32 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Müller (ELSOFT AG) @ 2001-10-23 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 463 bytes --]
Hello again
The attached patch fixes the following issues:
- arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
missing get_pteptr() prototype
- arch/ppc/kernel/i8259.c
consistent nameing (rather cosmetic change)
- arch/ppc/ppc_ksyms.c
missing flush_dcache_all() export
- arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c
added "l" format flag to sprintf() to make compiler happy
(cosmetic)
- arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c
adjust include file name
Dave
[-- Attachment #2: various_patches-1.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1203 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Various patches against linuxppc_dev-2.4.13-pre6
2001-10-23 6:25 [PATCH] Various patches against linuxppc_dev-2.4.13-pre6 David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
@ 2001-10-23 14:32 ` Tom Rini
2001-10-24 11:52 ` David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2001-10-23 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David M?ller (ELSOFT AG); +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:25:18AM +0200, David M?ller (ELSOFT AG) wrote:
> Hello again
>
> The attached patch fixes the following issues:
>
> - arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
> missing get_pteptr() prototype
Applied.
> - arch/ppc/kernel/i8259.c
> consistent nameing (rather cosmetic change)
Not sure about. Why either of those changes?
> - arch/ppc/ppc_ksyms.c
> missing flush_dcache_all() export
This only exists on CONFIG_NOT_CACHE_COHERENT, fixed and applied.
> - arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c
> added "l" format flag to sprintf() to make compiler happy
> (cosmetic)
>
> - arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c
> adjust include file name
Applied.
Thanks!
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Various patches against linuxppc_dev-2.4.13-pre6
2001-10-23 14:32 ` Tom Rini
@ 2001-10-24 11:52 ` David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
2001-10-24 22:48 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Müller (ELSOFT AG) @ 2001-10-24 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:25:18AM +0200, David M?ller (ELSOFT AG) wrote:
>
>
>>Hello again
>>
>>The attached patch fixes the following issues:
>>
>> - arch/ppc/mm/fault.c
>> missing get_pteptr() prototype
>>
>
> Applied.
>
>
>> - arch/ppc/kernel/i8259.c
>> consistent nameing (rather cosmetic change)
>>
>
> Not sure about. Why either of those changes?
>
The first patch is just a prettyprint fix. At least on my system
it looks better this way ;-)
Everywhere in the i8259.[ch] files the chip is called "i8259" with the
exception of one place which is fixed by the second patch. But as
i said, it's more of a cosmetic change.
>
>> - arch/ppc/ppc_ksyms.c
>> missing flush_dcache_all() export
>>
>
> This only exists on CONFIG_NOT_CACHE_COHERENT, fixed and applied.
>
>
>> - arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c
>> added "l" format flag to sprintf() to make compiler happy
>> (cosmetic)
>>
>> - arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c
>> adjust include file name
>>
>
> Applied.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Dave
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Various patches against linuxppc_dev-2.4.13-pre6
2001-10-24 11:52 ` David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
@ 2001-10-24 22:48 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2001-10-24 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David M?ller (ELSOFT AG); +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:52:09PM +0200, David M?ller (ELSOFT AG) wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:25:18AM +0200, David M?ller (ELSOFT AG) wrote:
[snip]
> >> - arch/ppc/kernel/i8259.c
> >> consistent nameing (rather cosmetic change)
> >
> >Not sure about. Why either of those changes?
>
>
> The first patch is just a prettyprint fix. At least on my system
> it looks better this way ;-)
>
> Everywhere in the i8259.[ch] files the chip is called "i8259" with the
> exception of one place which is fixed by the second patch. But as
> i said, it's more of a cosmetic change.
Okay, I wasn't totally sure about it and didn't have time to dig into
it. I'll throw those in sometime soonish.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-24 22:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-23 6:25 [PATCH] Various patches against linuxppc_dev-2.4.13-pre6 David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
2001-10-23 14:32 ` Tom Rini
2001-10-24 11:52 ` David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
2001-10-24 22:48 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).