From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3BE9D0C9.5E4A3F8@mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 17:24:41 -0700
From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: The Plan
References: <15337.7275.266062.777161@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0111071246050.11631-100000@mullein.sonytel.be> <20011107134125.O22194@boardwalk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


Val Henson wrote:

> I agree with Geert.  I don't think that dividing the clutter into two
> directories instead of one really improves matters.  Each directory is
> still monstrously huge and the division is non-obvious.
> arch/ppc/masochist would be easier to understand. :)

Yeah but if you do it the other way, you end up with a directory with a
clutter of subdirs--exchanged one clutter for another.

> What is the problem we're trying to solve here?

Hmmm, clutter I suppose but to be honest I don't have a problem with the way
it is now...

Mark


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/