From: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Organisation of 4xx initialization code
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:15:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BF549AA.80E0FCF4@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20011116164625.K673@zax
David Gibson wrote:
>
> At the moment the initialization for each of the 4xx boards goes
> through the platform_init() in arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c, which
> in turns calls a board_init() function for the specific board.
>
> It seems to me that it would make more sense to put platform_init() in
> the board specific files, and these functions could then call back,
> where appropriate, to generic 4xx setup functions. This would mean:
> - It would be easier to support wierd and wacky boards which
> have non-standard address setups.
> - Some ugly #ifdefs in ppc4xx_setup.c could be done away with.
> - We should be able to remove some inconvenient header
> dependencies - at present lots of things are recompiled when board
> local defines are changed because walnut.h/ep405.h/etc are included
> indirectly in serial.h and some other unexpected places.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a
> david@gibson.dropbear.id.au | solution which is simple, neat and
> | wrong. -- H.L. Mencken
> http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson
>
David,
I actual did the work a week ago and it became quite evident it was
pointless to restructure to that extent at this time (Dan & Tom both
laughed at me as well). We should address this when those weird & wacky
boards come along IMHO.
-- armin
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-16 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-16 5:46 Organisation of 4xx initialization code David Gibson
2001-11-16 11:57 ` Matt Porter
2001-11-16 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 16:42 ` Matt Porter
2001-11-16 17:13 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 23:24 ` Dan Malek
2001-11-17 0:43 ` David Gibson
2001-11-17 1:01 ` Dan Malek
2001-11-17 2:18 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-17 11:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-11-17 12:43 ` Ralph Blach
2001-11-17 14:46 ` Mark Pilon
2001-11-17 0:50 ` David Gibson
2001-11-17 2:16 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-17 0:35 ` David Gibson
2001-11-17 2:18 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 16:07 ` Mark Pilon
2001-11-16 17:29 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 14:59 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-17 0:40 ` David Gibson
2001-11-17 2:15 ` Tom Rini
2001-11-16 16:46 ` Dan Malek
2001-11-17 0:47 ` David Gibson
2001-11-17 1:11 ` Dan Malek
2001-11-16 17:15 ` Armin Kuster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BF549AA.80E0FCF4@mvista.com \
--to=akuster@mvista.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).