From: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor changes to control/imstt/platinum/valkyrie/atyfb
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 13:41:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C08CFF0.18A1FBC7@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20011127143058.R13091@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net
Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Hello all. The following patches make slight changes to the vmode/cmode
> logic on a few fb drivers. Now everone consistantly only tries to get
> these modes from nvram if CONFIG_NVRAM is defined (otherwise a
> compile-time error on everyone but atyfb). On imsttfb I made the logic
> only executed on CONFIG_ALL_PPC, and removed USE_NV_MODES (which
> shouldn't be needed now). However, I have none of this hardware, and I
> remember some of these drivers being very touchy. So could people with
> this hardware apply the patch and let me know if it works still?
For the valkyriefb driver on my Pmac 6400, I can confirm from a first
short test that it still works. This is with your patch applied to
today's 2.4.17-pre1-ben0 kernel.
I am not testing it very extensively, because this kernel crashes on me
as soon as pppd is started. Yesterday's 2.4.16-ben0 crashed when running
ping. Even on my iBook, the 2.4.16 gave me an "illegal lseek" when
trying to run ping (the 2.4.17-pre1 seems to work OK on the iBook).
Since the 6400 is serving as an adsl router, I prefer to go back to the
stable 2.4.0-pmac kernel from last January.
--
Martin
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-01 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-27 21:30 [PATCH] Minor changes to control/imstt/platinum/valkyrie/atyfb Tom Rini
2001-11-28 9:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-12-28 11:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-12-02 16:35 ` Tom Rini
2001-12-01 12:41 ` Martin Costabel [this message]
2001-12-02 10:14 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-12-02 21:11 ` Martin Costabel
2001-12-02 22:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-12-03 13:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-12-03 15:09 ` Tom Rini
2001-12-05 11:22 ` Martin Costabel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-03 8:10 Bill Fink
2001-12-02 23:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-12-03 15:29 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C08CFF0.18A1FBC7@wanadoo.fr \
--to=costabel@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).