From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3C5B26EA.C99DAE5A@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:38:18 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Val Henson , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: GT64260 ethernet References: <20020201134723.G30787@boardwalk> <20020201155645.B4843@havoc.gtf.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:47:23PM -0700, Val Henson wrote: > > We have a board with the Galileo GT64260 chip and we'd like to use the > > gt64260 ethernet driver. At the moment, its config option is in > > arch/ppc/config.in and is controlled by the CONFIG_GT64260 option > > (which is not turned on for our boards, CONFIG_GEMINI is). I'd think > > that the preferred way to fix this is to put the CONFIG_GT64260_ETH > > option in drivers/net/config.in. The alternative is to have > > I at least prefer to have as many drivers as possible, including > arch-specific ones, in drivers/net and listed in drivers/net/Config.in. > It makes life a lot easier when evaluating all drivers for a common bug, > or common cleanup. Yes, that make sense. I'll get that moved over. Mark ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/