linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ppc4xx_serial.c?
@ 2002-02-14  5:30 David Gibson
  2002-02-14  8:46 ` ppc4xx_serial.c? Stefan Roese
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2002-02-14  5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-embedded


Is arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c of any relevance any more?  It
doesn't include any code unless CONFIG_DEBUG_BRINGUP is defined, and
it doesn't look like it would compile, let alone be called, if it was
defined.

--
David Gibson			| For every complex problem there is a
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au	| solution which is simple, neat and
				| wrong.  -- H.L. Mencken
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: ppc4xx_serial.c?
  2002-02-14  8:46 ` ppc4xx_serial.c? Stefan Roese
@ 2002-02-14  8:06   ` Armin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Armin @ 2002-02-14  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Roese; +Cc: David Gibson, linuxppc-embedded


Stefan Roese wrote:
>>Is arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c of any relevance any more?  It
>>doesn't include any code unless CONFIG_DEBUG_BRINGUP is defined, and
>>it doesn't look like it would compile, let alone be called, if it was
>>defined.
>>
>
> That was also my impression. It seems, that this file could be removed.
>
> Stefan.
>
>
>
>
>

remnance from the intial release.

--armin


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: ppc4xx_serial.c?
  2002-02-14  5:30 ppc4xx_serial.c? David Gibson
@ 2002-02-14  8:46 ` Stefan Roese
  2002-02-14  8:06   ` ppc4xx_serial.c? Armin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2002-02-14  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Gibson, linuxppc-embedded


> Is arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c of any relevance any more?  It
> doesn't include any code unless CONFIG_DEBUG_BRINGUP is defined, and
> it doesn't look like it would compile, let alone be called, if it was
> defined.

That was also my impression. It seems, that this file could be removed.

Stefan.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-14  8:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-14  5:30 ppc4xx_serial.c? David Gibson
2002-02-14  8:46 ` ppc4xx_serial.c? Stefan Roese
2002-02-14  8:06   ` ppc4xx_serial.c? Armin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).