linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Donald White" <dbwhite@asu.edu>
To: "Navin Boppuri" <navin.boppuri@newisys.com>
Cc: "Linuxppc-Embedded (E-mail)" <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: SDRAM is finally working
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:41:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C744237.BCCDC004@asu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: D3A72C5007329A4F991C0DD87202259F096A65@sekhmet.ad.newisys.com


Navin,

While I have no right to ask, could you provide a tutorial on how one
goes from the SDRAM chip specifications to the UPM words?

I did a port of HHL 2.0 to an 860 board and never felt I really
understood the SDRAM initialization.  The board manufacturer provided a
set of UPM words.  These had been used by a previous vxWorks port.  But
burst mode never worked right for either and I was never confident that
the UPM words were right.

Thanks,

Don

Navin Boppuri wrote:
>
> I now have Linux kernel booting up and mounting a file system without
>any problems. I had all the timing right but my SDRAM initialization
>was messed up. My init sequence was missing a single NOP command at
>the very start. And so, things worked fine with PPCBOOT but with more
>memory intensive stuff that the kernel does, I had software emulation
>errors during the kernel boot.
>
> I appreciate all the help from Wolfgang in doing this. I got my very
>first SDRAM interface working on the 855 processor.
>
> I would like to point out to everyone in this mailing list that there
>is an App. Note from Motorola (ANxxx/D) that talks about a high speed
>SDRAM interface to the MPC823. The document is a good start for anyone
>trying to interface the 8xx processor to and SDRAM while running the
>bus at speeds greater than 50Mhz. But please NOTE that the timings
>shown in the example SDRAM interface in this App. Note for the Micron
>MT48LC* chip are very wrong. Please do not design your timing around
>this example.
>
> I looked at the sample timings from various board supports in PPCBOOT
>(eg. hermes). I manually inserted these timings into an *.mgp file for
>the MCUinit utility and looked at them in the GUI interface. But the
>final timings are totally dependent on your particular SDRAM chip ( The
>fact which Wolfgang tells us about all the time ;) ).

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-21  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11 19:42 SDRAM is finally working Navin Boppuri
2002-02-21  0:41 ` Donald White [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-21 20:17 Kerl, John
2002-04-15 19:00 ` Jin Cheng
2002-04-15 19:07 Navin Boppuri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C744237.BCCDC004@asu.edu \
    --to=dbwhite@asu.edu \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=navin.boppuri@newisys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).