linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Embedded MPC860T & flash memory
@ 2002-02-22 14:26 Laurent Pinchart
  2002-02-22 15:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2002-02-22 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-embedded


Hi everybody,

I'm developping a custom MPC860T board, and need 16MB of flash memory.

As I need to be able to write to the memory using the MTD layer, I was
wondering if it would be better to use 2 16-bit wide chips in
interleaved mode on a 32-bit bus (connecting them in parallel to the
bus, one of them storing D[0:15] and the other one D[16:31]), or to use
them in non-interleaved mode (non-overlapping address ranges) on a
16-bit bus. It seems that the Linux MTD layer can support both
configurations, but I don't have a deep knowledge of that code, and thus
would appreciate any advice.

I'll probably use AMD devices.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Laurent Pinchart


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Embedded MPC860T & flash memory
  2002-02-22 14:26 Embedded MPC860T & flash memory Laurent Pinchart
@ 2002-02-22 15:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
  2002-02-25 17:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2002-02-22 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: laurent.pinchart; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded


Dear Laurent,

in message <3C7654F8.3010801@capflow.com> you wrote:
>
> As I need to be able to write to the memory using the MTD layer, I was
> wondering if it would be better to use 2 16-bit wide chips in
> interleaved mode on a 32-bit bus (connecting them in parallel to the
> bus, one of them storing D[0:15] and the other one D[16:31]), or to use
> them in non-interleaved mode (non-overlapping address ranges) on a
> 16-bit bus. It seems that the Linux MTD layer can support both
> configurations, but I don't have a deep knowledge of that code, and thus
> would appreciate any advice.

For the software it does not matter - both configurations will work.

For the performance it makes a BIG difference.

Go for a buswidth of 32 bits, i. e. use 2 chips in 16 bit mode in
parallel.

Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
"The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody
appreciates how difficult it was."                        - Walt West

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Embedded MPC860T & flash memory
  2002-02-22 15:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
@ 2002-02-25 17:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2002-02-25 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wd; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded


>
>
>For the software it does not matter - both configurations will work.
>
>For the performance it makes a BIG difference.
>
>Go for a buswidth of 32 bits, i. e. use 2 chips in 16 bit mode in
>parallel.
>
Ok, thanks for your answer.

Laurent Pinchart


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-25 17:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-22 14:26 Embedded MPC860T & flash memory Laurent Pinchart
2002-02-22 15:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-02-25 17:15   ` Laurent Pinchart

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).