From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3CAA1C80.3070407@embeddededge.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 16:02:56 -0500 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: paulus@samba.org, linux-galileo@source.mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: EV-64260-BP & GT64260 bi_recs References: <0203210213.AA15856@ivan.Harhan.ORG> <3C99801A.8070002@embeddededge.com> <15526.51621.991410.781713@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <3CA8A96D.9040309@embeddededge.com> <15529.17031.622986.926261@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <3CA9EA93.5000404@embeddededge.com> <20020402201235.GA28287@opus.bloom.county> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: > It was probably me. Heh.....I'm just having some fun :-). I also know the reason you probably changed it was to either make munuconfig or something work, or had plans for CML-2. I think some of the confusing stuff we have for configuration is due to the tools themselves, and that sometimes is reflected in the way the code (#define and #ifdef) is written. > ... One thing I want to do in the 2.5 tree is make > arch/ppc/platforms/{8xx,4xx}.in and source those from > arch/ppc/config.in, I know that would help. What happened to CML-2? Thanks. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/