From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3CC6F830.807@pacbell.net> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:23:44 -0700 From: Armin MIME-Version: 1.0 To: andrew may Cc: Matt Porter , linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: Status on 405GP i2c driver References: <20020422141601.B16319@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020423160548.A5009@home.com> <20020423182301.B19665@ecam.san.rr.com> <20020424144733.GA11949@beef.az.mvista.com> <20020424083909.C17930@ecam.san.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: andrew may wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:47:33AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote: > >>It's not a good idea to merge the i2c-2.6.3 support into 2_4_devel. >> > > It seemed that Armins patch to the i2c list was against 2.6.3 so I deciede > to merge that in before I merged in Armin's patch. I started doing the merge > before you added in the files so that made things interesting. Unless you > think 2.6.3 has some new bugs I see no reason to back out the changes in > my tree. > Yes the patch sent to the i2c mailing list was against 2.6.3 since thats their latest version. The *.c & *.h files should be the same in both trees armin ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/