From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3CDC03C1.DB7A0E49@mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:30:41 -0400
From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mod+linuxppc-dev@MissionCriticalLinux.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: "broken" GT64260 ethernet driver
References: <200205100459.XAA27925@lists.linuxppc.org>  <3CDBFFC9.205DB0A5@synergymicro.com> <200205101724.g4AHOaAD023769@odonnell.lowell.mclinux.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


mod+linuxppc-dev@MissionCriticalLinux.com wrote:

> > there have been a lot of "this driver is broken" comments
> > on the thread.  I agree it's ugly, but it seems to work.
> > Can someone elaborate on exactly what is "broken"
>
> Last I knew, the situation was pretty much as you've described
> it: no profound problems (last I knew) and lots of griping.

Ditto.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/