From: "\"David Müller (ELSOFT AG)\"" <d.mueller@elsoft.ch>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Several patches agains linuxppc_devel-2.4.19-pre8
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 11:26:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE37B49.6000508@elsoft.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020515155200.GN721@opus.bloom.county
Tom Rini schrieb:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:35:55PM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
>
>
>>The attached patch fixes the following issues:
>
>
> Looks good, except:
> Don't #ifdef externs, if they aren't used it's OK.
> Since this code only has to work in recent'ish kernels (in reality only
> 'current' kernels) don't bother with the
> #ifdef MODULE_LICENSE
> ...
> #endif
>
> Just use it.
>
I have copied the MODULE_LICENSE stuff from another driver.
Does anybody knows if this feature is tagged to be a remove candiate in
future kernels and/or in the modutils?
Another question:
I've noticed that (at least) the following files have their executable
bit set, although they are simple C source files.
./include/asm-ppc/ppc405_dma.h
./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_dma.c
./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c
./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c
./arch/ppc/platforms/walnut.c
./arch/ppc/platforms/cpc700_pic.c
On the other hand, the PPCBoot kernel packer script in
./arch/ppc/boot/utils/mkimage.wrapper have the exec bit cleared.
Is it a bit task to fix this?
Dave
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-16 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-15 11:35 [PATCH] Several patches agains linuxppc_devel-2.4.19-pre8 "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-05-15 15:52 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-16 9:26 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" [this message]
2002-05-16 13:56 ` Tom Rini
2002-05-17 6:31 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-05-17 12:59 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CE37B49.6000508@elsoft.ch \
--to=d.mueller@elsoft.ch \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).