From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3CE4A3C8.8060507@elsoft.ch> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:31:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22David_M=FCller_=28ELSOFT_AG=29=22?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Several patches agains linuxppc_devel-2.4.19-pre8 References: <3CE2481B.5070108@elsoft.ch> <20020515155200.GN721@opus.bloom.county> <3CE37B49.6000508@elsoft.ch> <20020516135643.GF20456@opus.bloom.county> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini schrieb: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:26:33AM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote: > [old stuff deleted] >>Another question: >> >>I've noticed that (at least) the following files have their executable >>bit set, although they are simple C source files. >>./include/asm-ppc/ppc405_dma.h >>./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_dma.c >>./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c >>./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c >>./arch/ppc/platforms/walnut.c >>./arch/ppc/platforms/cpc700_pic.c >> >>On the other hand, the PPCBoot kernel packer script in >>./arch/ppc/boot/utils/mkimage.wrapper have the exec bit cleared. >> >>Is it a bit task to fix this? > > > I assume you ment big. And no, I've just fixed these. Thanks. > Yes, of course. Here's the list of exec bit set files for 2.5.15: ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_dma.c ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc405_pci.c ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c ./arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_setup.c ./arch/ppc/platforms/walnut.c ./include/asm-ppc/ppc405_dma.h Dave ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/