linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Brennan <dmb8@optonline.net>
To: acurtis@onz.com
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: eieio rule-of-thumb?
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:54:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CECF4AB.7393E521@optonline.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFAEIBDHAA.acurtis@onz.com


If you are using the 8260 the eieio does nothing. From the 603e User's
Manual:

The Enforce In-Order Execution of I/O (eieio) instruction is used to
ensure memory
reordering of noncacheable memory access. Since the 603e does not
reorder
noncacheable memory accesses, the eieio instruction is treated as a
no-op.

Allen Curtis wrote:
>
> > For access to PCI devices, use:
> >
> > {in,out}{b,w,l}               access to PCI I/O space (little endian)
> > {read,write}{b,w,l}   access to PCI memory space (little endian)
> >
> > For access to non-PCI devices on PPC platforms, use:
> >
> > {in,out}_8
> > {in,out}_{le,be}{16,32}
> >
>
> All of these make sense, but what about the Internal Memory Map? Are you
> suggesting that these macros should be used to access internal control
> structures, buffer descriptors, etc and ignore the structures defined in
> cpm_8260.h and imap_8260.h? In a typical system, this is where most of the
> non-cacheable I/O will occur. In many cases you probably do not care what
> order things happen at the micro level, in some cases you do. If you
> understand the problem you can optimize your solution, otherwise put the fix
> everywhere out of paranoia.  :)
>

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-23 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-22  4:43 eieio rule-of-thumb? Allen Curtis
2002-05-22  6:01 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-23  2:25   ` Allen Curtis
2002-05-23  4:26     ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-23 13:38       ` Allen Curtis
2002-05-23 13:54         ` Dan Brennan [this message]
2002-05-23 14:42           ` Allen Curtis
2002-05-23 17:28         ` Dan Malek
2002-05-23 17:45           ` Chris Thomson
2002-05-23 19:02             ` Dan Malek
2002-05-23 22:36             ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-23 18:44           ` benh
2002-05-23 18:02             ` Dan Malek
2002-05-23 22:58               ` Paul Mackerras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CECF4AB.7393E521@optonline.net \
    --to=dmb8@optonline.net \
    --cc=acurtis@onz.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).