From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3CFE5750.1010209@linuxfoundary.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 14:24:16 -0400 From: Dave Strout MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Basics -- what tools for Walnut? References: <3CFE4C3A.4070604@linuxfoundary.com> <3CFE4F42.DDB1D5CE@mvista.com> <3CFE54F6.1060605@embeddededge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: It's all good -- I didn't realize there was a newer binutils. 2.12 seems to do the trick thanks, dave. Dan Malek wrote: > > Frank Rowand wrote: > >> I suspect that is a fairly old tool chain that you are using. > > > In the past, the practice was to inform people when changes were made > that required a minimum revision of tools to operate properly. > Simply telling people "your toolchain is too old" isn't helpful..... > What version of tools is required to build this properly? Why > doesn't the check in comment indicate this information when the > change was made? > >> Try modifying arch/ppc/Makefile to use >> >> -mcpu=403 > > > Or, just remove it since it doesn't perform any useful function. On > the newer tools, it's required to allow the assembler to not bitch about > 4xx unique instructions, another non-useful function, IMHO. > > Thanks. > > -- Dan > > > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/