From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3D082846.4080005@embeddededge.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:06:14 -0400 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Surovegin Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: consistent_alloc from an interrupt context References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020612200144.00ab2398@mail.zultys.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020612211908.02c7b0e8@mail.attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Eugene Surovegin wrote: > I thought of it, but is it OK to modify arch-independent code with such > a hack? It's OK in your own code, I probably still have some around that looks like that :-) > Maybe this is the reason it never was accepted. I'll have to search for the messages where this was discussed and see what happened. I know it wasn't discussed on the PowerPC lists, it was on some other processor I was using. I was just able to make the same changes and test it on 8xx as well. > Though, it's obviously much simpler than solution I used :) Hey, whatever works......it's a hacker's world :-) -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/