From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <3D0E07DA.327DF963@imc-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:01:30 +0200 From: Steven Scholz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: LinuxPPC Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? References: <3D0DA9C2.D78C43E5@imc-berlin.de> <20020617153255.GS13541@opus.bloom.county> <3D0E0253.A6A56B53@imc-berlin.de> <20020617154925.GT13541@opus.bloom.county> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: > > Ehm... Does that mean you won't accept patches vs linuxppc-2.4 though > > !?!? > > That means I want this to be done in 2.5 first. Where development is > supposed to happen. I have this feeling that fixing commproc.h will be > more than 1 simple patch and we should do it in the development tree > first. Then, once that's all done and people are happy with it, we can > move it to linuxppc_2_4. Hmm... Just moving the DEFINEs from commproc.h to the board specific header files is indeed just ONE simple patch. I've done that already. I am not sure what else you mean by "fixing commproc.h"!? The thing is: Since I am sure that many, many people are still using linux-2.4.4 I would realy like to fix that in linuxppc_2_4_devel, linux-2.4.4 (DENX) _and_ PPCBoot at the same time! Just to keep that consistent. And I have to admit that I haven't had a look at linuxppc-2.5 at all so far... :-( Steven ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/