From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:33:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D10A455.7682EF16@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020619152528.GB12762@opus.bloom.county
Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 05:18:04PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> >
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sort-of supprised it works.
> > I told you, it's not that much to do...
> > :-)
> >
> > > Isn't:
> > > ((uint)0x....)
> > > in assembly bad?
> >
> > Hmm. Don't know. Maybe. But these are just DEFINES! So what should that
> > be bad?
>
> Oh yeah, right.. Hmm, it probably won't break anything then..
>
> > > I think we need to have all of these defines enclosed with the
> > > __ASSEMBLY__ test, but I can go fix that.
> >
> > At least spd8xx.h and tqm8xx.h don't have any #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ at
> > all!?
>
> (... waking up ...) Because the only C bits they had are now in
> <asm/ppcboot.h> which does the test right.
>
All right then. I can't do more testing due to the lack of hardware.
Maybe Wolfgang could spend a little of his precious time since he claims
to have a zoo of boards... :o)
(Especially TQM8xxL, FPS850L, SM850)
So when can I "bk pull" these changes then, Tom?
Good luck,
Steven
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-19 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 9:20 board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2002-06-17 15:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 15:37 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 16:01 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 17:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20020617173550.GV13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 17:46 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <3D106922.7026437A@imc-berlin.de>
2002-06-19 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:18 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:33 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2002-06-19 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:47 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 21:11 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-20 16:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-19 23:26 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-20 16:40 ` Dan Malek
[not found] ` <3D12F140.23BA447F@imc-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 14:18 ` John Traill
[not found] <20020617214339.GZ13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 22:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D10A455.7682EF16@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).