From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>,
LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:32:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D1203B2.6050409@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020619212246.GA16052@opus.bloom.county
Tom Rini wrote:
> And in the (un)fortunate grand linux tradition, new features with some
> demand from the users behind them get backported too. For example,
> 2.2.current (21? 22?) has all sorts of compat glue for 2.4 drivers and a
> rather current USB stack and all sorts of things like that..
It was probably done in 2.3.xx and backported, but yes, that does happen
and it is a good thing. However, it was first done in the newer, development
tree before it was ported into the current, stable kernel. I think
the first half dozen 2.4 releases were really 2.3.xxx, anyway :-)
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 9:20 board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2002-06-17 15:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 15:37 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 16:01 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 17:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20020617173550.GV13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 17:46 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <3D106922.7026437A@imc-berlin.de>
2002-06-19 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:18 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:33 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:47 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 21:11 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-20 16:32 ` Dan Malek [this message]
2002-06-19 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-19 23:26 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-20 16:40 ` Dan Malek
[not found] ` <3D12F140.23BA447F@imc-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 14:18 ` John Traill
[not found] <20020617214339.GZ13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 22:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D1203B2.6050409@embeddededge.com \
--to=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).