From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3D65C19C.2070503@embeddededge.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 01:01:16 -0400
From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: acurtis@onz.com
Cc: Ppc Embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: 8260 Memory Management
References: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFCEBHDLAA.acurtis@onz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


Allen Curtis wrote:

> Since the 8260 is based on a PPC 603e core, is there any reason why the
> memory management should differ from the other Mac implementations?

Well, yeah, it's not a Mac......

> Would it be reasonable to make the 8260 memory management consistent with
> the rest of the 6xx processors?

It is.  Please try to describe what you mean a little better.

Thanks.

	-- Dan


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/