From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com>
To: Adrian Cox <adrian@humboldt.co.uk>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Caching in the MPC107
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:03:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D7E25F4.4CC00BF8@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1031672735.2686.58.camel@newt
Adrian Cox wrote:
> I think the problem was only visible because the pcnet32 device polls a
> descriptor small enough to get cached in the MPC107, and no other PCI
> master is active to read this cache. I don't currently have access to a
> Sandpoint X3 to test this out on.
>
> The problem seems to be a logical consequence of the documented and
> correct behaviour of the MPC107 and the 7450 family: a PCI read causes
> the MPC107 to cache the line, and the 7450 to mark the line shared. As
> _PAGE_COHERENT is not set, the 7450 does not produce an address only
> transaction when it writes to the line and changes it back from shared
> to modified. The physical evidence was using the scope to see a PCI read
> go into the MPC107, and the MPC107 respond without any cycles on the 60x
> bus.
Adrian,
I think I understand what you're saying. The biggest question that comes to
my mind, though, is whether this is a problem on many of the other
hostbridges? Most of the newer bridges will buffer a cacheline or two. Is
this a wider issue than just the 107?
Mark
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-10 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-09 14:23 Caching in the MPC107 Adrian Cox
2002-09-10 14:58 ` Tom Rini
2002-09-10 15:45 ` Adrian Cox
2002-09-10 17:03 ` Mark A. Greer [this message]
2002-09-10 17:17 ` Adrian Cox
2002-09-10 23:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-09-11 12:52 ` Adrian Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D7E25F4.4CC00BF8@mvista.com \
--to=mgreer@mvista.com \
--cc=adrian@humboldt.co.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).