linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se
Cc: Matt Porter <porter@cox.net>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 14:59:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DF1018C.7080508@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: IGEFJKJNHJDCBKALBJLLOEJHFIAA.joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se


Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

> Yes and no, someone changed the m8xx_cpm_hostalloc() implementation and now
> it does not behave as it used to. Earlier both __pa(adr) and __va(__pa(adr))
> worked on addresses returned by m8xx_cpm_hostalloc().

I changed it a while back so single large pages could be used to map the
kernel space.  Just use iopa() on the virtual address to get the physical
address.  I don't understand the current condition of commproc.c today, but
I'm not the only one that updates it anymore.  The bk comments are quite
useless since all they indicate is some obscure patch was applied.

> I think in it's current form it's useless and should either be changed back to what
> it was or die.

It seems quite useful to the drivers that currently use it.........It's
only purpose is to provide small non-cached objects like uart fifos and control
areas.  Don't try to use it for things not intended.


	-- Dan


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-06 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-06 13:18 Regarding consistent_alloc Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 13:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 14:25   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 15:59     ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 16:08       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:30         ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 18:15           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:52             ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:59             ` Dan Malek [this message]
2002-12-06 22:11               ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07  0:16         ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-07 12:53           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 16:53             ` Dan Malek
2002-12-09  9:06           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-10 17:49             ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11  3:52               ` acurtis
2002-12-11  8:57                 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-11  9:58                   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 14:41                     ` acurtis
2002-12-11 15:01                       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 15:36                         ` acurtis
2002-12-12  3:32                       ` Dan Malek
2002-12-11 14:56                     ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 15:07                       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12  3:41                         ` Dan Malek
2002-12-12  8:00                           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12  8:18                             ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-12-12  8:37                               ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 12:56                                 ` Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC? Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-12 18:28                                   ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-12 20:35                                     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-13  4:12                                       ` acurtis
2002-12-13  6:09                                       ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-13  7:47                                         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-16 14:41                                           ` acurtis
2002-12-13  4:08                                     ` acurtis
2002-12-12 16:53                               ` "Missing" patches (Was: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc) Tom Rini
2002-12-06 16:56       ` Regarding consistent_alloc Dan Malek
2002-12-06 18:29         ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:45           ` Dan Malek
2002-12-07  0:25           ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-06 15:54 ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DF1018C.7080508@embeddededge.com \
    --to=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=panto@intracom.gr \
    --cc=porter@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).