linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@lumentis.se>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>, Matt Porter <porter@cox.net>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 11:53:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DF22784.7040502@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 003c01c29def$9b3d5df0$0300a8c0@jockeXP


Joakim Tjernlund wrote:

> Is consistent_alloc really needed?

YES.

> .... All uses I have seen in the kernel for the 8xx CPU can be solved with
> a kmalloc....

The cpm_hostalloc() solves a different problem.  It is used to allocate
small non-cached object so you don't need the overhead of the cache
management functions every time you want to do something like write a byte
to a uart.  It is specific to the CPM on the 8xx, so you can apply the
proper assumptions about io mapping for a lightweight and efficient solution.

I've constantly criticized the Linux VM implementation for having different
functions and semantics for different VM spaces, and I'm always told something
to the effect "...it's the Linux way to make it efficient..."  So, I did
the same thing for 8xx and CPM.  There are lots of places in the Linux VM
where you can apply only certain operations to certain VM objects.  It
seems I've kept up the spirit :-)


	-- Dan


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-07 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-06 13:18 Regarding consistent_alloc Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 13:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 14:25   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 15:59     ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 16:08       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:30         ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 18:15           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:52             ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:59             ` Dan Malek
2002-12-06 22:11               ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07  0:16         ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-07 12:53           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 16:53             ` Dan Malek [this message]
2002-12-09  9:06           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-10 17:49             ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11  3:52               ` acurtis
2002-12-11  8:57                 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-11  9:58                   ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 14:41                     ` acurtis
2002-12-11 15:01                       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 15:36                         ` acurtis
2002-12-12  3:32                       ` Dan Malek
2002-12-11 14:56                     ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 15:07                       ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12  3:41                         ` Dan Malek
2002-12-12  8:00                           ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12  8:18                             ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-12-12  8:37                               ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 12:56                                 ` Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC? Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-12 18:28                                   ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-12 20:35                                     ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-13  4:12                                       ` acurtis
2002-12-13  6:09                                       ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-13  7:47                                         ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-16 14:41                                           ` acurtis
2002-12-13  4:08                                     ` acurtis
2002-12-12 16:53                               ` "Missing" patches (Was: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc) Tom Rini
2002-12-06 16:56       ` Regarding consistent_alloc Dan Malek
2002-12-06 18:29         ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:45           ` Dan Malek
2002-12-07  0:25           ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-06 15:54 ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DF22784.7040502@embeddededge.com \
    --to=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=Joakim.Tjernlund@lumentis.se \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=panto@intracom.gr \
    --cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=porter@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).