From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org,
Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Subject: Re: New style dpalloc/hostalloc routines (diff).
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:01:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E080647.8060407@intracom.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021223164928.GF15397@opus.bloom.county>
Tom Rini wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:57:24AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>
>>Here is the updated patch in diff format as per your suggestions.
>
>Looks good. My only real issue is that this is a big change, so I would
>rather see either (or both) of the following happen:
>Make a patch vs 2.5. This will require additional 8xx work to get
>things going again.
>Please hold on this until all of the otherwise stable 8xx work can get
>out of the linuxppc_2_4_devel tree and into linuxppc_2_4 / Marcelo.
>
>Also, Dan Malek, any comments on all of this?
Well, I'll try but I haven't messed with 2.5 yet.
Does it even work at all for 8xx?
Has anybody in the list worked with it?
I would very much like the two trees getting merged
finally, as I'm forced to maintaining my own tree,
forked off Marcelo.
Regards, and Merry Christmas to all
Pantelis
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-24 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-18 12:39 New style dpalloc/hostalloc routines (diff) Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-19 23:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-20 8:09 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-20 9:57 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-23 16:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-23 20:07 ` Dan Malek
2003-01-20 0:31 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-24 7:01 ` Pantelis Antoniou [this message]
2002-12-24 14:25 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-18 12:38 Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-18 12:51 ` Pantelis Antoniou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E080647.8060407@intracom.gr \
--to=panto@intracom.gr \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).